Urbanicity, Income and Jury Verdict Amounts in Civil Litigation
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper reports on investigation and research explaining possible factors that affect the final award amount given by juries in civil cases. The two key variables examined are urbanicity and median household income. Data on civil trials collected through the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics’ The Civil Justice Survey of State Courts provided the primary data set for the study. The data set includes 156 counties and is a nationally representative sample of bench and jury trials. Urbanicity ratings, as well as median household income, were reported for each county. Pearson’s correlations indicated no statistically significant relationship between urbanicity ratings and final award amount or between median household income and final award amount for cases decided by a jury. Evaluations of the linear relationship between final award amount and urbanicity using Pearson’s correlation indicated no significant correlation between final award amount and urbanicity ratings. This study concludes that juries were not as susceptible to external influences or factors such as their location and income when awarding the plaintiff of a civil case.
منابع مشابه
Why tobacco litigation?
1 the tobacco control community cheered. The jury had calculated that only one in 28 000 Californians who have suffered from tobacco caused disease ever sues, so to make Philip Morris confront the real cost of its misbehaviour, they multiplied a typical $1 million compensatory damage award (for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering) by 28 000. Right on! Even though the trial judge s...
متن کاملCourtroom Observation and Applied Litigation Research: A Case History of Jury Decision Making
Quantitative research has dominated applied litigation research, but it seems to lack the flexibility needed to link pretrial research to ongoing courtroom events. Participant observation is a methodology which seems more suitable for studying the dynamic environment of a trial. A 6-day civil trial is used to evaluate participant observation reports against pretrial survey analysis and trial si...
متن کاملDo Defendants Pay What Juries Award? Post-Verdict Haircuts in Texas Medical Malpractice Cases, 1988-2003
Legal scholars, legislators, policy advocates, and the news media frequently use jury verdicts to draw conclusions about the performance of the tort system. However actual payouts can differ greatly from verdicts. We report evidence on post-verdict payouts from the most comprehensive longitudinal study of matched jury verdicts and payouts. Using data on all insured medical malpractice claims in...
متن کاملAn Analysis of Malpractice Litigation and Expert Witnesses in Plastic Surgery
Objective: Expert witness testimony is crucial for juror decision making. The goals of this study were to examine the trends in malpractice litigation in plastic surgery and to examine the characteristics of expert witnesses in litigation. Methods: The Westlaw legal database was queried for jury verdict and settlement reports related to plastic surgery cases from 2009 to 2015. Cases were examin...
متن کاملIVC Filter Malpractice Litigation; Damned if you Do, Damned if you Don't.
OBJECTIVE To analyze malpractice litigation trends and to better understand the causes and outcomes of suits involving inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) to prevent future litigation and improve physician education. METHODS Jury verdict reviews from the WESTLAW database from January 1st 2000 to December 31st 2015 were reviewed. The search term "inferior vena cava filter" was used to compile da...
متن کامل